Increased late mortality with percutaneous stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis relative to coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

نویسندگان

  • Hisato Takagi
  • Masafumi Matsui
  • Takuya Umemoto
چکیده

Study selection Comparative studies of percutaneous coronary stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting that enrolled patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis were eligible for inclusion. Eligible studies had to provide adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality with at least one year of follow-up. Studies from which hazard ratios or risk estimates could not be extracted were excluded. The main outcomes were adjusted hazard ratios for mortality with at least one year of follow-up.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Acute and Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Introduction : Significant left main coronary artery stenosis jeopardizes the entire myocardium of the left ventricle and has the worst prognosis of any form of coronary artery disease. Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered as the standard therapeutic approach for such patients. There are limited data on the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PC...

متن کامل

All-cause mortality in patients with unprotected left main coronary disease: comparison between stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting.

All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Disease: Comparison Between Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting The interventions aimed at patients with unprotected left main coronary disease are supported by a vast amount of data, the interpretation of which is increasingly difficult. For this purpose, studies using traditional meta-analysis and/or metaregression a...

متن کامل

Late stroke: comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel disease and unprotected left main disease: a meta-analysis and review of literature.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Studies have suggested that the early excess risk of stroke in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be compensated for by a slow but progressive catch-up phenomenon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We therefore undertook this analysis to compare the temporal stroke risk between PCI and CABG in patients with unprotected left main steno...

متن کامل

Is surgery or percutaneous revascularization the preferred strategy for patients with significant left main coronary stenosis? Percutaneous Revascularization Is the Preferred Strategy for Patients With Significant Left Main Coronary Stenosis

In the early 1970s, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was found to improve late survival in comparison to medical therapy in patients with significant left main stenosis.1–3 Once CABG became the standard of care for left main disease, a distinction between “protected”—by at least 1 patent bypass graft to the left coronary artery—and “unprotected left main (UPLM)”— no patent bypass graft to th...

متن کامل

Bayesian methods affirm the use of percutaneous coronary intervention to improve survival in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND Several randomized clinical trials support the use of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Studies suggesting the equivalence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with CABG for this indication indirectly support the 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Class IIa recommendati...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery

دوره 139 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010